Відео

Can anyone tell me what distinct means ? I'm not an English speaker. I google definition but couldn't understand! It's confusing

26:23 but the "certainty" of the "a priori" may be contested as for Anselms sample .. ? what am I missing here ?

1:13:10 ty ! again. For me “logical insights” and religious “lows” are really an impressive concept to debate with a conservative rabbi. 🧘‍♀️

1:56:43 ty Prof Jack; great idea to bring a “religious king” into Plato. 🤦🏼‍♂️.. looking fw

TRYING to be ethically correct IS OBLIGATORY but being successful in what you were trying is not obligatory.

❤

1

❤

Ye

Each argument leading to a conclusion needs at least 2 supporting argument and each of those needs least 2 supporting arguments resulting in exponential number of supporting arguments being required. E.g if you go 20 arguments deep with 2 arguments you end up with 1,028,576 supporting arguments. However, I guess, the pre-life knowlege is based on perfect knowlwdge (whatever that is) and does not need supporting arguments because they just are?

Another fun game to play with the definition "God is a being than which none greater can be imagined". Given that all human imagination is limited, then there cannot be any god greater than the greatest human imagination of God, and it is that God whose existence is proven i.e. a God of limited greatness.

Interestingly if I replace God with Superman, the existence of Superman is proven. However if I replace God with Zeus (the god of gods), the existence of God is disproven, as now we have two gods, nether if which are greater than the other.

The 4 causes introduction was really useful in particular when reading other philosophers explaination of non-phsycical attributes.

Anyone know which books @jacksanders2611 is refering to within this series? Might want to buy a copies :)

Plato's knowledge criteria implies he is a believer in reincarnation. As he probably was aware that more people are born than die each year, I wonder if he believed that souls are created in this 'well of souls where the perfect knowledge resides'; or that there are certain number of souls in there and eventually no more births will happen (or maybe soulless births?)

Zeno's Achilles and the tortoise paradox fails because Zeno has made Achilles' goal to be where the tortoise used to be, instead of the goal being to be in front of the tortoise. If you reword the paradox so that instead of Achilles being where the tortoise WAS to Achilles being slightlly in front of where the tortoise WILL BE, then the paradox fails.

Anybody could help me understand if this Symbolic Logic has anything related with the hot Machine Learning, Deep Learning? It seems to me Symbolic Logic is tooo classic so that it has become remote and no need to spend time to learn. I am new to this area. Thank you for any explanation!

august comte ... founder of sociology ? what about ibn khaldun

Michael Knight gives a good lecture. I'd like to hear Lecture #2 with KITT.

Very intellectually satisfying! What philosophers and/or theologians do you know of who have wrestled with the infinite regress issue? Thomas Aquinas I think.

Do not hassle the Hof...

Informative lecture

Thanks for uploading. You are the expert as well sincere man. I have watched all lectures ,benifitted alot. Authoritative lectures on subject concerned. Thanks again

Wonderful lecture. Thank you for posting!

i’m 15 and have recently been fascinated with philosophy. thank you for this introduction! it was very clear and easily comprehensible.

I have been watching this playlist of Introduction to Philosophy with extreme focus and it's been really helpful in trying to understand the basics of philosophy. Philosophy is not my major , I just started out of curiosity after watching philosophical debates on UA-cam. I wanted to say that I am very grateful for this amazing content you have put out. THANK YOU A lot.❤

Thank you

I am really enjoying this. Can you recommend a reading(s) to go with this? Also, a book on world philosophies? Again, thank you for creating and sharing these; I really like your approach!

Could understanding the philosophy of other cultures be the key to solving global conflicts?

I'm intrigued by your take on this topic. It complements the themes I've been exploring in my videos.

Your perspectives are incredibly valuable and resonate with the content I've been creating. Great to be part of this knowledgeable community.

Your insights are incredibly valuable and complement the themes I've been discussing on my channel. It's wonderful to see such shared passion.

Your insights are incredibly valuable and complement the themes I've been discussing on my channel. It's wonderful to see such shared passion.

Thales born and lived in Miletus

The prof is so nice to his students... during my time at uni in the 2000's (University of Cape Town) , the lecturers were very mean and condescending. Different times, or different culture?

thanks for a nice lesson

I'm required to take Philosophy in a couple of weeks. I thought I would find some lectures to get a head start as I thought I would not enjoy the subject. But I was wrong. This series is great and the topic is really interesting.

great introduction and i have better understanding on philosophy

Second time listening to this series. Thank you for your contributions to my learning

Get that spazz out of the foreground, morons.

Thank you very much!

😃😃

Your lecture is quite interesting Professor !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ua-cam.com/video/tY2njfpWC8g/v-deo.html

To the question "what is philosophy of something", Can I say that the philosophy of a subject matter is the act of the demystification of the subject matter .

It's a very interesting lecture.

It's very interesting lecture.

the teacher that I always wanted❣

His religious beliefs keep spilling out..

@jacksanders2611 Dr. Sanders, if the word "if" typically precedes the antecedent, which means that what comes after "then" in an if/then clause would be the consequent, wouldn't example number 3 @ timestamp 48 minutes 32 seconds be written as follows: (~D ⊃ A)? The original text was: "Ames is a politician only if he is not disreputable". Here, based on the antecedent-if-rule above, I think the antecedent is "If he is not disreputable" and the consequent is "Ames is a politician". So, to symbolize this as (~D ⊃ A) would expand to "If Ames is not disreputable, then Ames is a politician". In class, we got the answer (A ⊃ ~D), but I think this would translate to "If Ames is a politician, then he is not disreputable". I think the former sentence is closer to the original prompt than the latter when we consider the position of the word "if" and its implications. This would also go hand in hand with the reasoning from example number 4 at the same timestamp, where in the answer (~D ⊃ A), the "D" clause precedes the "A" clause because of the setup of antecedent/consequent in the material conditional from the prompt, which was "Ames is a politician if he is not disreputable". Maybe I'm missing something? I think this is correct.